Question:
Underline the subordinate clauses in the following sentences and identify their function?
anonymous
2014-01-06 22:22:05 UTC
1 Their expertise is more extensive than I had expected.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Looking in the mirror, she saw something move behind her.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 I simply couldn’t believe what the President was saying.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 The man who promised change seems to be only a devious weasel.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 Recently, finding a job has become very difficult.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 Robert promised me that he'd send a postcard
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Four answers:
Gary B
2014-01-08 13:06:57 UTC
1 Their expertise is more extensive than { [what] I had expected }.



The clause "[what] I had expected" is a nominative clause acting as the object of the preposition "than". The subject is "I", the verb is "had expected" and the direct object is "what". The entire clause could be replaced by the pronoun "that": Their expertise is more extensive than that.





2 Looking in the mirror, she saw something move behind her.



As it stands, there is no subordinate clause. However, given only one additional letter, the following version does have one:



- Looking in the mirror, she saw { [that] something moved behind her }.



With "moved", the nominative clause acts as the direct object of the verb "saw". The subject is "something", the verb is "moved", and "behind her" is an adverbial prepositional phrase modifying the subject. The entire clause can be replaced by the noun "movement": Looking in the mirror, she saw movement.



With only "move", "something" is the direct object and "[to] move behind her" is the bare infinitive object complement.





3 I simply couldn’t believe { what the President was saying }.



The nominative clause acts as the direct object of the verb "could believe". The subject is "the President", the verb is "was saying" and the direct object is "what". The entire clause could be replaced by the pronoun "that": I simply couldn't believe it.





4 The man { who promised change } seems to be only a devious weasel.



The relative clause acts as an adverb modifying the simple subject "man". The entire clause can be removed without affecting the grammar of the remaining sentence: The man seemed to be only a devious weasel. The clause could also be replaced with the adjectival participle "lying": The lying man seemed to be only a devious weasel.





5 Recently, finding a job has become very difficult.



As it stands, there is no subordinate clause. "Recently" is an adverb, modifying the verb. "Finding a job" is a gerund phrase serving as the subject. "Has become" is the verb. "Very difficult" is an adverb phrase modifying the verb.





6 Robert promised me { that he'd send a postcard }.



The nominative clause acts as the direct object of the verb "promised". The subject is "he", the verb is "would send" and the direct object is "a postcard". The entire clause can be replaced by the pronoun "something": Robert promised me something.
anonymous
2016-12-18 09:06:39 UTC
Identify Subordinate Clauses
Tom L
2014-01-08 07:03:41 UTC
1. The subordinate clause is "than I had expected." It is an adjective clause used as part of a predicate nomonative.



2. Does not have subordinate clause. There is a participial phrase (looking in the mirror). It is an adjective phrase, modifying 'she.'



3. Subordinate clause is "what the President was saying." That is a noun clause, direct object of the verb 'believe.'



4. Subordinate clause is "who promised change.'" That is an adjective clause, modifying 'man.'



5. Does not have subordinate clause. It is a simple sentence.



6. Subordinate clause is "that he'd send a postcard.' That is a noun clause, direct object of the verb 'promised.' 'Me' is the indirect object.
?
2014-01-07 04:10:11 UTC
1. A compound sentence , "more" used as the co-ordinating conjunction.



2."Looking at the mirror" is a phrase of the sentence where "Looking" is a gerund used as a noun.



3. A complex sentence the principal clause of which is -I simply couldn't believe

Subordinate Noun Clause - what the president was saying. (Object to the verb "believe")



4. The man seem(s) to be only a devious weasel -Principal Clause

who promised change-- Subordinate Adjective Clause ( _pposition to the noun "man".



5.Recently- adverb.

findind- derund used as the subject of this simple sentence , "become" being the principal verb.



6. Robert promised me- Principal Clause.

that he'd send a postcard.- Subordinate Noun Clause(object to "me")



My answers are based on my presumptions, so, please evaluate it.



Thank you.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...